gasilnutrition.blogg.se

Neoload ci
Neoload ci






Run NeoLoad using Continuous Integration  Requiring involvement from Ops or perf.  Swap sharing the Load Testing environment  bottlenecks  Comparing multiple short samples  inaccurate  Comparing results over long gaps time  risky  Schedule Neoload to run using CI? Hmmmm… we do have Jenkins.  Schedule NeoLoad to run using NeoLoad internal scheduler?  Schedule NeoLoad to run using Cron jobs?  Collect performance metrics while we run our automated regression?  How could we include LT more often, under Agile process?  Needed a way to bake Load Testing into our Agile process.  Load testing wasn’t keeping pace with our Agile teams.  Relied upon Ops and/or performance engineer (bottleneck risk)  Completed “in the margins” by perf engineer + agile team member.  Still had all of the same problems getting Load Tests done.  But, most team members had little load testing experience.  Team mindset: “Performance is everybody's job”  Sped up development + shortened our dev lifecycle!  “Everyone is responsible for quality” approach  Continuous Delivery to test environments  Sometimes it was “testing for the sake of testing”  Centralized around performance engineer (bottleneck risk)  The most recent set of results for comparison was often many weeks old.  Often, the tests were short samples due to time constraints.  Limited time to re-work performance issues before release dates.  Performance testing still occurred end of dev cycles  Is performance of the project branch better/no worse/worse than mainline  Compare project results to baseline results  Run scripts on mainline branch to obtain baseline results  Configure for multi-user concurrency & unique dataĢ) run existing NeoLoad scripts + compare w/ previous release resultsģ) run NeoLoad scripts on project vs mainline branches, comparing results Three options to include Neoload testing for a release:ġ) author new NeoLoad scripts designed to target specific concerns.  stockpile load test results for future benchmark comparisons  now easier to include load testing for releases  implement an automated load testing tool  Started generating performance test results  Used CI to automate deployment & configuration of this env  Properly designed for load testing high volume

NEOLOAD CI TRIAL

 Started to Trial + Assess several load testing tools  Hopefully one that would inspire us to load test earlier + more often.  An automated tool could help us load test. Late testing  Late Discoveries  Delayed Releases. Scheduled automation avoids waiting on humans, keeps a faster pace.  New development methodologies  more frequent releases  If load testing occurs less frequently than desired  2 mil hits per month on most visited web page  “retail busy season”: Black Friday  Christmas  Processed $10bil GrossMerchValue for our customers in 2014  Goal: Facilitate e-commerce sales growth for our customers  Translate & route drop shipment orders amongst business partners.  Connection between 200+ retailers and 8,900 brands/distributors.  Hosted services for e-commerce & retail.  Our experience adding NeoLoad to our Continuous Load Testing using Continuous Integration tools






Neoload ci